Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 06:42

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
European leaders worry they’re too reliant on U.S. tech - TechCrunch
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Live Updates From Apple WWDC 2025 🔴 - Gizmodo
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
$10,000 2-year CD accounts: Here's why they're worth opening now - CBS News
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
watchOS 26 Moves Latest Apple Watch Models to New Architecture - MacRumors
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Which Red Sox prospect will be next to draw Roman Anthony-level excitement? - MassLive
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
How the Menstrual Cycle Affects ADHD - The Cut
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Taylor Swift Owns Two Versions of Four Albums. Now What? - Billboard